Starship | SN10 | High-Altitude Flight Test

3 мар 2021
8 415 463 Просмотров

On Wednesday, March 3, Starship serial number (SN10) successfully completed SpaceX’s third high-altitude flight test of a Starship prototype from our site in Cameron County, Texas.
Similar to the high-altitude flight tests of Starship SN8 and SN9, SN10 was powered through ascent by three Raptor engines, each shutting down in sequence prior to the vehicle reaching apogee - approximately 10 km in altitude. SN10 performed a propellant transition to the internal header tanks, which hold landing propellant, before reorienting itself for reentry and a controlled aerodynamic descent.

The Starship prototype descended under active aerodynamic control, accomplished by independent movement of two forward and two aft flaps on the vehicle. All four flaps were actuated by an onboard flight computer to control Starship’s attitude during flight and enabled a precise landing at the intended location. SN10’s Raptor engines reignited as the vehicle performed the landing flip maneuver immediately before successfully touching down on the landing pad!
As if the flight test was not exciting enough, SN10 experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly shortly after landing. These test flights are all about improving our understanding and development of a fully reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo on long-duration interplanetary flights, and help humanity return to the Moon, and travel to Mars and beyond.

  • 👍👽

    Виталий ЛукашинВиталий Лукашин3 часа назад
  • It's so. incredibly. loud. WOw!

    emmmemmm4 часа назад
  • Amazing job!

    Heybar SequeraHeybar Sequera10 часов назад
  • Was that real footage or CGI interspersed with real footage?

    stringsnarestringsnare19 часов назад
    • Real footage, all the way through. It was a livestream.

      alexn310alexn310Час назад
  • 11:42 The best most unbelievable non CGI part of the video. Truly amazing shot

  • MUY BUENO- UN ABRAZO Y UN BESO GORDO- El video mio se encuentra en el YOU TUBE y se llama- robotizado con cd 4017 , ne 555 pilotos El plano esta bajo el video. Andre Troll Kaiser

    andre trollandre troll2 дня назад
  • Wow! I thankyou but i think the landing was far more astounding than the take off. Fantastic👍👍👍

    Frank TuckwellFrank Tuckwell2 дня назад
  • 11:41 Looks like one of those movie scenes.

    Glitched BloxGlitched Blox3 дня назад
  • Huge Respect for the Engineers, technicians and every worker at SpaceX 🙏💯.

    bcvbb hyuibcvbb hyui3 дня назад
  • Es una nave de Flash Gordon, OMG!

    moises gonzalesmoises gonzales3 дня назад
  • Cortaram a parte da explosão pq? HUAUHAUHHAUUH medo de cair ações elon musk?

    Caio PortellaCaio Portella3 дня назад
  • amazing..

    onemaxlightonemaxlight3 дня назад
  • For a moment, it looked CGI.

    ICOD73ICOD733 дня назад
    • I watched this with my own eyes. 100% not CGI.

      Alex HendrixAlex Hendrix2 дня назад
    • Nice

      bcvbb hyuibcvbb hyui3 дня назад
  • The reduced vibration of this missile is an unparalleled precedent

    Ailsa NiAilsa Ni3 дня назад
  • Man will go mars no earlier than 2040. Even a small cybertruck takes years to be released to public, I can't imagine how long it will take starship to meet all the requirements. Probably decades. The news says we will see Man on mars very soon, just to keep us high expectations, but I think it's just marketing. I'm just being realistic.

    Igor Delta F.Igor Delta F.4 дня назад
    • @Igor Delta F. Where do you get your information about the cybertruck starting in 2012?

      69693 дня назад
    • @69 the idea of a cybertruck started in 2012. The first prototype was in 2018. The first cybertruck to public will be in the end of 2021. Starship is so far to meet the requirements, without mentioning the human limitations in other fields to make this reality. 2040 is a optimistic year, and I hope I am wrong because I want to be alive when man go there.

      Igor Delta F.Igor Delta F.3 дня назад
    • The cybertruck will be out either this year or 2022. SpaceX can have people on Mars within 10 years.

      69693 дня назад
  • So Elon is iron man because that seems a lot like how iron man lands 😄👀

    little Phoenix33little Phoenix334 дня назад
  • happen live 😂

    vbddfy euuytvbddfy euuyt4 дня назад
    • @Ailsa Ni what

      David XDavid X3 дня назад
    • Демократия не долетит до Марса.

      Ailsa NiAilsa Ni3 дня назад
  • did anyone else notice the hard bounce on landing or the drone view that looked like a cheap netflix movie?

    Wayne DavisWayne Davis5 дней назад
  • hi mates is very enjoy...blazz_zzzz

    Olavo NevesOlavo Neves5 дней назад
  • congratulations

    SadSmileTVSadSmileTV5 дней назад
  • What a bunch a shit! Can't believe y'all into this crap, CGI at the end got me cracking, no craft can do that TODAY , c'mon guys wake the fuck up

    JP muroJP muro5 дней назад
    • @alexn310 brother, the question is, have been there? Anything that nasa's selling i ain't interested. You people keep saying go to boca chica , u never been there , everything is 30 miles distance , you cant see from there. Do the homework.

      JP muroJP muro50 минут назад
    • @JP muro Look up NASA Spaceflight, its an amateur group, they do almost daily drive arounds of the site. Its at a highway which is publicly accessible, you can view launches from isla blanca park.

      alexn310alexn310Час назад
    • @alexn310 have you ever been? No one can access the site its 30 miles in, away from the city. I bet you have, did you take pictures? I dont think so. 🤔

      JP muroJP muro3 часа назад
    • There's no point in faking this there's literally no reason for faking this.

      69693 дня назад
    • Okay, prove it!

      TimeProTimePro3 дня назад
  • Modern warfare CGI looks way better , should give em a call #elonmusk

    JP muroJP muro5 дней назад
    • Go to boca chica

      David XDavid X3 дня назад
    • looks like a sci fi film

      vbddfy euuytvbddfy euuyt4 дня назад
  • Alles nur lüge

    Björn der SachseBjörn der Sachse5 дней назад
    • Jede Person mit einem Donald Trump Profilbild hat still zu sein

      Volksgenosse Erich HoneckerVolksgenosse Erich Honecker4 дня назад
    • Go there yourself and see it for yourself

      alexn310alexn3105 дней назад
  • This style of aircraft- is it "Flash Gordon" style? Or more Rocketeer?

    Andy HarrisonAndy Harrison6 дней назад
  • nice cgi

    shark2vshark2v6 дней назад
    • Go to boca chica

      David XDavid X3 дня назад
    • You can go there yourself and see it

      alexn310alexn3106 дней назад
  • Is this even real? It looks like cgi

    John McGrathJohn McGrath6 дней назад
    • yeah, its because it is

      Juan Pablo MuroJuan Pablo Muro6 часов назад
    • @alexn310 ye

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ5 дней назад
    • Go to Boca Chica, TX. You can see these getting built and flown in real time there.

      alexn310alexn3106 дней назад
  • Nice

    Lexi TalksLexi Talks6 дней назад
  • ไอ้ควายน็อตบอกแผนทุกอย่างองค์กรNASA มีแผนอยากเป็นเบอร์1ของสหรัฐ.แล้วจะกลับไปใช้สถานีอวกาศสกดจิตทุกพรรคในสหรัฐ. ให้สนับสนุนเงินงบประมาณและมีตัวแทนNASA ที่หวังลงชิงต่ำแหน่งประธานาธิบดีสหรัฐ.ในสมัยต่อไป

    แก่ง นางแก่ง นาง6 дней назад
  • NASA กลายเป็นควายเมื่อถูกจับได้ว่าใ้ดาวเทียม และใช้สถานทีอวกาศทดลองมนุษย์ แต่สู้ความคิดมนุษย์ไม่ได้ โดยล่าสุดมีการเปิดเผย ชื่อบอร์ดผู้สั่งให้มนุษย์อวกาศบนสถานีอวกาศทำงานนี้

    แก่ง นางแก่ง นาง6 дней назад
  • 12:00 I see starhopper

    Dave TimothyDave Timothy7 дней назад
    • ye love starhopper

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ5 дней назад
  • What I don’t like about the BFR is that there is no redundancy. Since fuel tanks are located in the nose cone, the crew cannot jettison from the top to escape an inevitable failure. Any manned flights must have redundancy.

    Saanichton MinistriesSaanichton Ministries7 дней назад
    • @Saanichton Ministries I agree ...,.. I don’t see nasa trusting SpaceX to place astronauts on Mars anytime soon until starship has at least 200-600 successful flights without incidence along with a smart AI to pilot starship However SpaceX does have falcon Heavy which is a proven space vehicle which I do see NASA trusting to send to the moon or Mars 🥲 Only the future will tell

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez6 дней назад
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez fair enough. After a study of the STS program, it would be a nightmare to fly on a rocket. As a pilot myself, it is fascinating science. But way too risky. I don’t ever see the risk factor going away. Man it too flawed. Too much can go wrong in manned space flight. Too many extremes. I don’t know if it is ethical watching people kill themselves trying to go to Mars.... like the Mars one project?

      Saanichton MinistriesSaanichton Ministries6 дней назад
    • @Saanichton Ministries Is this suppose be hyperbole ....? Obviously not, they only flow 4 of them🤦🏻and their still very much prototype rockets That’s the equivalence of me asking you if you’d like a flight on the wrights brothers first plane .....

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez6 дней назад
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez would you if you could?

      Saanichton MinistriesSaanichton Ministries6 дней назад
    • @Saanichton Ministries 🤨 ....... no I don’t

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez6 дней назад
  • Демократия не долетит до Марса.

    Денис ПетинДенис Петин7 дней назад
  • bravo let's Mars but if Mars gravity is lower than Earth it's going to be easy landing

    Pascal FokxPascal Fokx7 дней назад
    • ouais

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ5 дней назад
  • FIREBALL XL5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • looks like a sci fi film

    vince mmvince mm7 дней назад
    • ye but is real

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ5 дней назад
  • That is bull shit.

    Carmen A. CabelloCarmen A. Cabello7 дней назад
    • @Shorty haha

      It’s grantIt’s grant5 дней назад
    • Carmen is close to karen

      ShortyShorty5 дней назад
    • @alexn310 thanks for saving me time

      It’s grantIt’s grant7 дней назад
    • Go and watch it yourself in boca chica before throwing bullshit accusations on RUworld

      alexn310alexn3107 дней назад
  • 24 7 live Mars cam coming soon : )

    Nebula DustNebula Dust7 дней назад
  • Congrats, the best sci fi movie ever... it's incredible...

    collilab laboratorio visivocollilab laboratorio visivo7 дней назад
  • Большая консервная банка с крыльями и двигателями..круто..поздравляю. Она еще и садиться..супер..

    Константин ГолубятниковКонстантин Голубятников8 дней назад
  • I like how they cut out where it exploded anyway. Scrub X blew it again. At least they are consistent.

    Jephro321Jephro3218 дней назад
    • Did you even seen the live stream?

      K4!T3NK4!T3N2 дня назад
    • This is the testing stage it's normal for things to blow up.

      69693 дня назад
    • @Jephro321 Was saying no to you stating they cut it out. Yes it exploded, but they didnt "cut it out" they ended the stream before it exploded.

      alexn310alexn3107 дней назад
    • @alexn310 no what it blew up period.

      Jephro321Jephro3217 дней назад
    • No? This was a livestream, they ended it after it landed. No use showing it sitting around for 8 minutes.

      alexn310alexn3107 дней назад
  • launch pad is too close to the installations ! dangerous

    gilbondfacgilbondfac8 дней назад
  • When landing, the ignition is too late to correct. It needs to be 1-2 seconds earlier.The liquid fuel bunker should be divided into many small bunkers. Otherwise, if the whole bunker is turned vertically to horizontal, and then to vertical, the kinetic energy of the liquid itself can heat itself, causing expansion and deflagration

    KK FFKK FF9 дней назад
    • @TimePro oh nvm I commented on this before I check Elon’s Tweet again I kinda didn’t remember the case

      Epic gamer Heap1Epic gamer Heap1День назад
    • @Epic gamer Heap1 Starship DOES use helium. After SN8s crash helium was put into the header tank of SN9 and SN10 to keep the tank pressurized and to prevent what happened to SN8. The helium was not supposed to be ingested.

      TimeProTimeProДень назад
    • @TimePro An Starship does not have helium it only uses lox, methane fuel and pressure.

      Epic gamer Heap1Epic gamer Heap12 дня назад
    • @Epic gamer Heap1 That would be the case for SN8. SN10 has a hard landing because it ingested helium unexpectedly.

      TimeProTimePro3 дня назад
    • It is not late according to Elon the single raptor engine was low on thrust to due low pressure inside of one of the tanks

      Epic gamer Heap1Epic gamer Heap14 дня назад
  • Вероятно, данная труба должна изображать носитель? Труба еле-еле взобралась на высоту 2 км и опустилась на землю. Как она собирается разогнать полезный груз до необходимой скорости? Это просто лапша для неграмотных.

    Dolores IzabellaDolores Izabella9 дней назад
  • Need to add a parachute placed on top of the missile, when it falls straight. Need to improve the landing cooling system with the missile fixation axle after landing, I mean upgrading the yard system so that under it there is a shaft that can move and attach itself. as a landing gear. Maybe so, try using a flying parachute that cuts off when the Rocket is falling in mid-air. hm ... i think this idea can be sold, maybe n't 😄

    Huỳnh Đức LêHuỳnh Đức Lê9 дней назад
    • @Huỳnh Đức Lê Please for the love of god stop calling it a missile!

      It’s grantIt’s grant7 дней назад
    • @Huỳnh Đức Lê Yes, but they've already demonstrated they can land it without, and a parachute would also increase turnaround time for reuse. No need for one if propulsive landing can already yield the requested results.

      alexn310alexn3107 дней назад
    • @alexn310 I know it's heavy, I mean the parachute is only used for a short time and then cut off when the missile is horizontal, except that the missile is placed at the top of the missile retained at the upright position. The parachute flew horizontally should be two moderate instead of one large enough to bear the load since it would be cut off to enter the final stage anyway. Although mainly used to reduce the force and help more stability, the possibility of wind, the weather will adversely affect the parachute and affect the missile but this problem can be improved. which is that you can use three parachutes to change your posture from horizontal to straight if you cut the parachute from the tail of the Rocket.

      Huỳnh Đức LêHuỳnh Đức Lê7 дней назад
    • Starship is too heavy for a parachute.

      alexn310alexn3107 дней назад
  • what do you make of this: Take a look at the spaceX logo. (the actual logo). When I look at the logo SpaceX... I'm seeing: Spy.... then it says..... Cc .....(which in numerology is 33. Freemasons number). .... Then what looks like a symbol that appear to be something trying to 'break out of the dome". So that's one interpretation. Or another: Spa cex. Or in other words "Spa Sex". then the X in that looks like it could represent the act of sex (look carefully, it's crazy.) (boom-chic-a-waa-waa). Okay and a 3rd interpretation goes like this: SpaceX. Well "X" in english and internationally is a way of saying "No". So it's Space-NO. or in reverse: No Space. Which is pretty obvious these days. So those are 3 interpretations of the SpaceX LOGO.

    nice guynice guy9 дней назад
    • @nice guy I have no patience for people with special needs

      It’s grantIt’s grant2 дня назад
    • @69 no joke. All major corporate logos have something encoded.

      nice guynice guy2 дня назад
    • @It’s grant no joke. All major corporate logos have something encoded.

      nice guynice guy2 дня назад
    • @K4!T3N The rockets are a scam. The cars are turning out to be a scam. Everyone who's used PayPal for any length of time knows it's a complete scam. What has he turned out yet that's actually a quality product that's not a lie or a scam??? The car is one thing, because it's just a really really shitty car. But the rockets are total frauds. It's not space exploration. It's a fireworks company. People are so dumb they don't understand anything.

      nice guynice guy2 дня назад
    • You milking it??.... bruuuuuuhhhh

      K4!T3NK4!T3N2 дня назад
  • I think that the engineers made a mistake in constructing the "SN" rocket in that they practically limited the cooling of the "Raptor" engine. When the descent starts and the engines start, they start or do not work. Then air pressure is created which returns the heat to the "pot", so to speak. With Falcon rockets, the engines are free and they don't have that problem. One of the solutions is to drill holes in the lower part, next to the legs, or to line the engines with refractory material.

    Biljana Milinčić-BežanovićBiljana Milinčić-Bežanović9 дней назад
  • Did anybody see the paper clip to the right of screen

    hordes Coffeehordes Coffee9 дней назад
    • ?????????? please show when?????????? U OK DUDE????????????

      It’s grantIt’s grant7 дней назад
  • Well done folks . Keep it up .

    Die KatzeDie Katze9 дней назад
  • cgi did not improve much i guess..

    derms terderms ter9 дней назад
    • @K4!T3N you speak like you came from there lol

      derms terderms ter2 дня назад
    • @derms ter Go to boca chica, texas.... you're just lazy... lol

      K4!T3NK4!T3N2 дня назад
    • @derms ter Theirs no need...... theirs hundreds of videos of the landing .......

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez6 дней назад
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez you film the landing for me, i will believe

      derms terderms ter6 дней назад
    • @derms ter Go to boca chica in the next 2-3 weeks for SN15..........Lets see if its CGI at that point :)

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez6 дней назад
  • team.

    bouytt guytbouytt guyt10 дней назад
  • Оооо ес 🤑

    FinZdravFinZdrav10 дней назад
  • Cool

    nothing is impossiblenothing is impossible10 дней назад

      Aistis AukstikalnisAistis Aukstikalnis8 дней назад
  • The mature pan practically observe because custard adventitiously refuse apud a unadvised captain. handy, dull black

    Ca SneaksCa Sneaks10 дней назад
  • Eh 3 years left before the starship goes to Mars

    Jared Johanne AgustinJared Johanne Agustin10 дней назад
    • Comento : viendo lo bien me llama la atención la toma de este lanzamiento que alguien por favor me explique como se realizo esta toma que tipo de cámara se uso no se s

      bouytt guytbouytt guyt10 дней назад
  • That.... was incredible!

    Ron GuadaRon Guada10 дней назад
  • soooooo perfect

  • Release the onboard camera during descent so that we can see space at that altitude. Oh nevermind, it's still the decades long grammar why not

    dLedger XYZdLedger XYZ10 дней назад
    • This flight went to 10km. If you want to 'see space at that altitude', whatever that means, you'd be better served by booking a flight on an airliner, as they can get up to 13km.

      Brent SmithBrent Smith4 дня назад
  • more tax payers money down the Shitter

    Boris WrongstonBoris Wrongston10 дней назад
    • Your probably more dependent on the government tax payers than SpaceX is.........Their a private space company :)

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez6 дней назад
    • It's a private company, no tax payers money

      Ethan RobertsEthan Roberts10 дней назад
  • The reduced vibration of this missile is an unparalleled precedent

    ceerw butyceerw buty10 дней назад
  • You are coming from the SN11 flight test yesterday. 😂

    Charalampos AvgenikosCharalampos Avgenikos10 дней назад
    • Yes 😭😭

      ForgeSkyGamingForgeSkyGaming9 дней назад
  • Это что то фантастическое

    Максим ПоскинМаксим Поскин11 дней назад
  • The typical profit quantitatively scold because height formally mix notwithstanding a steadfast room. squeamish, incandescent net

    Peter ZhuPeter Zhu11 дней назад
  • the geniuses just keep showing off.. very impressive

    Daniel PerezDaniel Perez11 дней назад
    • Give it a few more minutes

      ceerw butyceerw buty10 дней назад
  • Congratulations 🎉👍

  • The brash destruction joly add because tuna tellingly complain notwithstanding a helpful smile. quizzical, bright nation

    one clickone click11 дней назад
  • The dramatic club relevantly kiss because otter broadly scorch per a selfish aluminium. square, impolite temple

    Mayo GarlandMayo Garland11 дней назад
  • pero tambien da la impresión que fue un lanzamiento controlado preparando algo a si como para un futuro aterrizaje esa son mis tres impresiones no se elucubro

    Manuel MartinManuel Martin11 дней назад
  • Comento : viendo lo bien me llama la atención la toma de este lanzamiento que alguien por favor me explique como se realizo esta toma que tipo de cámara se uso no se si existe tecnología para enfocar a tan larga distancia esta toma me hace recordar un programa de Tv de cuando era niño .( Thunderbirds Los Guardianes del Espacio ) que por cierto todo lo que allí emitían hoy día es una realidad ........................suspicacia

    Manuel MartinManuel Martin11 дней назад
  • Рогозин обосрался...

    Андрій ВолодимировичАндрій Володимирович11 дней назад
  • Who’s here after SN11 blew up mid-flip maneuver

    Jay PaintJay Paint11 дней назад
    • @Jay Paint That's better!

      KidSpaceFansKidSpaceFans2 дня назад
    • @KidSpaceFans Yeah that sounds a bit pessimistic. Let me fix that.

      Jay PaintJay Paint2 дня назад
    • mid-landing flip you mean

      Pol VallsPol Valls10 дней назад
    • It didn't blow up mid-flight...

      KidSpaceFansKidSpaceFans10 дней назад
  • Elon: NUCLEAR MISSILE COMIN' YOUR WAY!... Just kidding...

    ᛏᚤᚱᚠᛁᚾᚷᚱᛏᚤᚱᚠᛁᚾᚷᚱ11 дней назад
    • a missile coming belly first?

      Pol VallsPol Valls10 дней назад
  • ...SpaceXtastic...!!!

    Ian MortonIan Morton11 дней назад
  • Shouldn't have launched sn11 in the fog, it was gonna blow up anyway even if the FTS didn't work. Welp sn15 here we come

    asterisKsasterisKs11 дней назад
    • Wether there was fog or not it doesn’t change anything.

      TimeProTimePro6 дней назад
    • That's what I said! And everyone went mental at me for calling SpaceX foolish as fuck for doing so. Completely rushed and wasted.

      Darth RevanDarth Revan7 дней назад
  • great achievement, the landing is awesome, but somehow i don't like those type of spaceships. I believe one day we will go into one piece of fully controlled spaceship :)

    DonDon11 дней назад
  • Yep, I knew it

    Syahrul RidzuanSyahrul Ridzuan11 дней назад
  • High altitude ? ??? It's a rocket , ten kilometers ( six miles ) is not high . Germany was sending rockets that high in 1944 . 76 years and no progress ??? . And this is an empty rocket , load her up with fuel and life support systems and this tin can will never leave the launch pad . MARS has nothing to fear

    Neil McmacNeil Mcmac11 дней назад
    • @Neil Mcmac so you're stuck in the past considering you said you lived through the 60s and 70s. You're hated for Elon Musk also seems to be getting in the way of your good judgment if you ever had any. Starship and Saturn v are not comparable. We did not have real reusable rockets in the 40s quit making up shit.

      69693 дня назад
    • @Pol Valls dollars to doughnuts says Musk picks up and leaves town before any of his make believe rockets ever reach orbit . He is just suckling as many dollars out of the system that he can , or are you one of those morons that really believe Musk is using his own money . Lay off the drugs and try to think ahead a little , you load that tin can up with supplies, life support, crew quarters and extra engines and fuel to orbit and de-orbit and you have a disaster waiting to happen . Nothing but a pipe dream .

      Neil McmacNeil Mcmac5 дней назад
    • @Neil Mcmac falcon 9 landed at its 5th try and now it's the most reliable rocket. Starship had 4, and next prototype is full of new technologies successfully proven. Please, don't compare a mission to a test. The expectations are different, Saturn V was pioneering, Starship is so too. And Sn10 landed. SN11 tested advanced solutions, they learn from them and they will do the same, fly fail fix

      Pol VallsPol Valls5 дней назад
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez yeah it wasnt a good paragraph but you get the point that im trying to make. again, you said it very well

      IsaQuestIsaQuest6 дней назад
    • @IsaQuest because you don't learn anything if the damn thing is not balanced as it would be , or loaded as it would be . Musk is going ass backwards . Proving something that doesn't help him one little bit in the real world . Put weights in to make up for crew, fuel, live support . Now test it , Musk is testing on an empty can , the balance point will not be close to what a real ships balance would be ,,,,, so at the end of the day Musk has learned zero .

      Neil McmacNeil Mcmac6 дней назад
  • Give it a few more minutes

    haug0099haug009911 дней назад
  • whos here after sn11

    ToXiC_BigFatBabyToXiC_BigFatBaby11 дней назад
  • 🚀My rating: Starship SN8: 8/10 Starship SN9: 4/10 Starship SN10: 9/10 Starship SN11: 2/10 Gonna update my rating every time from now on.

    Latortuga 007Latortuga 00711 дней назад
    • @IsaQuest no.

      Pol VallsPol Valls10 дней назад
    • @TimePro the leaning was cool too

      Latortuga 007Latortuga 00710 дней назад
    • SN9 I'd say would be also 9/10. They fixed the header tank issue that was present in SN8s flight.

      TimeProTimePro10 дней назад
    • @Starship SN10 ur welcome! ☺️

      Latortuga 007Latortuga 00710 дней назад
    • Thanks!

      Starship SN10Starship SN1010 дней назад
  • Nutso!!lol...beautiful but nuts!!!congratulations to the whole team!!

    Armchair RevolutionaryArmchair Revolutionary11 дней назад
  • I remember when these looked like grain silos

    EfloorEfloor11 дней назад
  • The trite market significantly harass because ship lilly glow without a empty history. wrong, depressed maraca

    Gerald WagnerGerald Wagner11 дней назад
  • didnt it explode a couple minutes after?

    Afri ColaAfri Cola11 дней назад
    • this is the test flight video, this is not the video of the entire recovery process

      Pol VallsPol Valls10 дней назад
    • it exploded 8 minutes later. but that's the fault of the landing legs,

      Roland B.Roland B.10 дней назад
  • Who is here after SN11?

    tomer Ktomer K11 дней назад
    • me

      Pol VallsPol Valls10 дней назад
    • Me

      27ratri kongsanti27ratri kongsanti11 дней назад
    • me

      Jan ScampiJan Scampi11 дней назад
  • The quality is amazing

    KaterinaTalantlivaKaterinaTalantliva11 дней назад
  • 'these datas'

    CYBERCELCYBERCEL11 дней назад
  • COMPLETELY CGI !! Maybe they want to remember others to the old SS20 ....

    HalumashHalumash11 дней назад
    • @K4!T3N what?

      69692 дня назад
    • @69 Go to boca chica texas.... You're just lazy

      K4!T3NK4!T3N2 дня назад
    • @Halumash that argument doesn't even make sense.

      69693 дня назад
    • @69 And propably they where the same reasons since that time in 69 , Mister 69 ...

      HalumashHalumash3 дня назад
    • @69 I already changed my mindset, my dear. Good night!!

      HalumashHalumash3 дня назад
  • kkkkkkkk a partir dos 10 min. computação gráfica, só se for muuuuito idiota pra acreditar

    Emerson GalattiEmerson Galatti11 дней назад
    • its not cgi. just look at the other people’s footage

      IsaQuestIsaQuest11 дней назад
    • esse cinegrafista é bom heim, caiu junto com o foguete, manteve-o nivelado no centro da imagem e só pra mostrar que é bom mesmo deu zoom out aos 11:35, aos 11:41 se vc não riu eu não vou te explicar...aos 12:05 a quicada na nave é a melhor...enfim...é por isso que os maus não disfarçam mais, não é necessário...

      Emerson GalattiEmerson Galatti11 дней назад
  • E mesmo que subas tão alto como uma águia e entre as estrelas plantes o teu ninho Eu te derrubarei.

    Rui SarmentoRui Sarmento11 дней назад
  • Even if it blew up, my confidence in SpaceX has never been higher, and it will keep going up.

    Dhruva ShahDhruva Shah12 дней назад
  • Or even space travel

    hordes Coffeehordes Coffee12 дней назад
  • Could it be possible to building an atom smasher in space. And place it vertically? Because, Im assuming that it must be laid down on earth, it could draw objects to it. If some way we could manipulate a simulated gravitational pull. We could then harness it as anti gravity. If its on or around an object. Could that work, is this possible. Or build it separately build some large mass to simulate a gravitational pull like earth's. Just asking a question

    hordes Coffeehordes Coffee12 дней назад
  • Starship on the pad after landing is something straight out of a movie. I mean that's a two lane highway right next to it! Its too big to be real

    alexanderx33alexanderx3312 дней назад
  • but they didn't show it blowing up which it did 6 mins later after landing

    Your MomYour Mom12 дней назад
    • They stopped the recording before it blew up.

      69693 дня назад
  • These times remind me of the 60s and mans desire to go beyond what we never thought would never be possible. Really amazing ship and really amazing guy Elon Musk.

    VirtualEchoboltVirtualEchobolt12 дней назад
  • Nice animation!

    Ash WilliamsAsh Williams12 дней назад
    • Go to boca chica

      David XDavid X3 дня назад
    • It’s real

      MOLEMOLE11 дней назад
    • Ooo which part?

      Bloody EvolutionBloody Evolution12 дней назад
  • It is definitely no coincidence, that the bellyflop starts at T+4:20

    SeverinSeverin12 дней назад
  • Да... И это не мультики. Привет от батута!

    Aleksander BukrinskyAleksander Bukrinsky12 дней назад
  • launch is tomorrow

    rlk studyrlk study12 дней назад
  • God I have chills, the future is enroute.

    fo0manfo0man12 дней назад